I just don’t think she’d be off gallivanting with all these detectives trying to take down El Cuco if she was, herself, a monster. Nor is it possible that this isn’t actually Holly. She was hired to help look into his case and has mentioned him many times before. There’s no way she doesn’t know who Terry is, and even all the stress and trauma and fear that she’s just experienced with Jack’s ambush, Andy’s death and the confrontation with the Outsider, wouldn’t make her suddenly forget the subject of her investigation.
There are plenty of different ways to interpret this, of course, but none of them feel right to me. Is it another monster, or just a copy-cat killer? Weird that we don’t hear a single thing about it in the season finale.īut the most confounding moment in the entire episode-far more than the bizarre post-credits scene-is when Ralph mentions clearing Terry’s name to Holly and she replies, “Who’s Terry?” Speaking of which, we never hear about the other dead boy in Cherokee Creek. But burying all evidence of El Cuco? That hardly seems to help in their cause to exonerate Terry, or to track down potential other monsters. If they revealed him to the world and he was taken to be studied or incarcerated, there is a pretty good chance that he could scratch someone or get free somehow. First of all, I can understand why you might not want to risk the beast escaping.
0 kommentar(er)
